Career Highlights  

  • First attorney to file an inter partes reexamination request before the USPTO   and succeeded in having all claims of the patent ruled invalid or disclaimed.                                                                         
  • Successful in third party reexamination requests filed as a prelude to litigation.                                                                                                                                                      
  • Won a milestone case against a perennial litigant involved with at least 49 trademark cases in the Northern District of Illinois since 1988 and known user of frivolous lawsuits. The Judge's decision, in December 2006, ended years of trademark abuse and extortionate protection schemes against organizations throughout the world.In re Leo Stoller, Case No. 05 B 64075, slip op. 9/26/06 (Bankr. N.D. Ill.)

Bar & Court Admissions

District of Columbia Virginia U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit U.S. District Court, District of Columbia U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia U.S. Patent and Trademark Office U.S. Supreme Court

Select Representative Cases

District Court

In re Dimmable Compact Fluorescent Lamps, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-830 - patent
Hubbell Incorporated v. The Watt Stopper – patent
Hubbell Incorporated v. Dynamic Lighting, Inc - design patent
Hubbell Incorporated v. Acuity Brands, Inc. – design patent, trade dress

Arysta Lifescience North America, Inc. v. The Hide Group - patent
Intersections, Inc. v. Lifelock, Inc. - trademark, unfair competition
Hubbell Incorporated v. U.S. Pole Company, Inc. - design patent 
Sports Design & Development, Inc. v. Pure Fishing, Inc. - trademark, trade dress

Hubbell Incorporated v. Genlyte Group, Inc. - patent
Normark Corporation v. Pure Fishing, Inc. – trade dress
Etigra LLC v. Bayer Cropscience – patent, trade secret, copyright

Taymac Corporation v. Hubbell Incorporated - patent
​Nisus Corporation v. Control Solutions, Inc. - copyright
​Nisus Corporation v. Schirm USA - copyright
Central Mfg. Co. v. Pure Fishing, Inc. – trademark, unfair business practices
Countrywide Financial Corporation v. Texas International Property Associates – domain name dispute
TayMac Corporation v. Hubbell Incorporated – patent
Hubbell Incorporated v. Genlyte Thomas Group – patent
Inter Partes Reexamination of US 6,232,427 “Esterification Method”, Control no.  95/000,001


Stoller v. Pocekovic, Consolidated appeal nos. 2008-1569 thru 2008-1576 (Fed. Cir.) 

Stoller v. Pure Fishing, Inc., , Nos. 06-3792, 06-4057, 07-1936, 08-3915 (7th Cir.)


In re Leo Stoller, No. 05-B-64075 (Bankr. N.D. Ill.

Professional Affiliations

- Member, Editorial Board, Law Practice Management Magazine, American Bar Association

- Member, Litigation, Intellectual Property, Science and Technology Law Section, American Bar Association

- Liaison, Science and Technology Law Section, Standing Committee on Technology and Information Systems, American Bar Association

Member & past Section Council member, Science and Technology Section, American Bar Association

- Member, American Intellectual Property Law Association

- Member, District of Columbia Bar Association

- Member, Virginia Bar Association 

- Past Contributing Associate Editor, Bulletin of Law, Science and Technology, American Bar Association

- Past Co-chair, Science and Technology Law Section Committee on Crime and Privacy, American Bar Association

- Past Liaison, Standing Committee on Publishing Oversight, American Bar Association 

Past Columnist, "Recent CAFC Decisions," Litigation Section Newsletter, American Bar Association

Law Office

Johnson Legal PLLC


The George Washington University Law School, J.D., 1987
​Iowa State University, B.S. in Chemical Engineering, 1982